|
Mon, May 16, 05 at 2:54
| It is me again.
I have been walking round all day with Henry in tow trying to work out where to put my Climbing Cecille Brunner Rose. Does she grow very large and sprawly or is she more on the smaller side ? Do I need a flat trellis or an arch ? Thanks for all you help so far with my new venture into roses. Marion. |
Follow-Up Postings:
|
| I've read that she can grow to 6-7metres high. I'm not sure in what conditions this would happen though. Pretty impresive for a dainty little flower like that! Of course with pruning it doesn't have to be anywhere near that height. It would be nice to let it get to a reasonable sort of size just because it is so pretty. Really it's a matter of where you have the space. You can literally prune it with the hedge shears. I have to warn you....I am NO expert when it comes to roses. I just read a lot! LOL Cheers, Dee. |
|
| One that I see regularly covers the whole front of an admittedly small inner city house. And I read in someone's catalogue recently the warning "Do not underestimate the size of this rose..." |
|
| Thank you Dee and Meryl, I seem to have a giant flowering fairy on my hands. I did a Google and was so surprised to see the size they can grow. My Mother always had a bushy type. I guess some strong building is about to happedn here. Marion |
|
- Posted by Bluebelle_Riverina z9 NSW (My Page) on Tue, May 17, 05 at 20:20
| Your mother may have had "Spray Cecile Brunner" - which can grow into a very large shrub. This one was commonly referred to as Cecile Brunner as I was growing up. It seems there is a difference in the names and "Cecile Brunner" is actually a smaller bush. I think much confusion still abounds. Ann |
|
| Hi Marion You need to work out if you have the real climbing Cecile Brunner or Spray Cecile Brunner which is also called Bloomfield Abundance (the name seems to be interchangable). It has the same flowers but BA is a very big climber . Unfortunately some nurseries do not differentiate. The thing that sets Bloomflield apart are the long whiskery calyx lobes that hang down from the flowers. The flowers are pretty much identical to Cecile Brunner. The real climbing Cecile Brunner is a more modest climber but I have read that it does not flower as well as Bloomfield Abundance. Check the flowers and you will know what you have. I have just looked up Yates roses and the author says that Spray Cecile Brunner was mislabelled as Bloomfield Abundance in the 1930s. Cheers Deryn |
Please Note: Only registered members are able to post messages to this forum. If you are a member, please log in. If you aren't yet a member, join now!
Return to the Roses in Oz Forum
Instructions
- You must be a registered member and logged in to post messages on our forums.
- Posting is a two-step process. Once you have composed your message, you will be taken to the preview page. You will then have a chance to review the contents and make changes.
- After posting your message, you may need to refresh the forum page in order to see it.
- It is illegal to post copyrighted material without the owner's consent.
- HTML codes are allowed in the message field only.
- No advertising is allowed in any of the forums.
- If you would like to practice posting or uploading photos, please visit our Test forum.
- If you need assistance, please Contact Us and we will be happy to help.